i

Revista de Arquitectura accepted for inclusion in SciELO Chile collection

 

Call for Papers Revista de Arquitectura N. º 49.  

 

ARCHITECTURE, URBANISM, AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: POISON OR MEDICINE? + FREE THEME

 

Deadline for receipt of articles:  September 7, 2025

Guidelines for authors: https://dearquitectura.uchile.cl/index.php/RA/about/submissions

A way of looking at the Munch Museum

Authors

Abstract

The article develops a way of working from the Herreros Studio in the Munch Museum project, based on strategies that promote the exhibition space as a place of events. They use the diagram to organize the program and connect spaces, working with flexibility that allows for heterogeneity and programmatic change where other agents of the community intervene in the definition of the museum and which it completed with the users. A methodology consisted of developing a story that begins from the competition and the references based on the connectivity of the diagram for the definition of identities. This open narrative explores the museum ́s concept through diagrammatic situations both in the architectural, social, and political plane, and its capacity to foresee the spatial appropriation of users is the clue to proposing an expanded version of the museum: The museum is the city.

Keywords:

Collectivity, connectivity, diagram, Munch Museum, story

References

Do, E. Y-L., & Gross, M. D. (2001). Thinking with diagrams in architectural design. Artificial Intelligence Review, 15, 135-149. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006661524497

González Salinero, B. (2013). Bandas programáticas: variaciones de una estructura organizativa

en la obra de Rem Koolhaas/OMA [Tesis doctoral]. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, España.

Herreros, J., Blumenstein, E., Ellefsen, K. O., Janson, N., Pfanner, D., Roma, V., ... & Walker, E. (2023). Lambda Files: The Project for the Munch Museum in Oslo. Spector Books.

Jovanovic, V., & Baumann, C. (2015). The ‘versatile monument’ question: Parc de la Villette as managed reality. Journal of Landscape Architecture, 10(3), 78-89. https://doi.org/10.1080/18626033.2015.1094918

Jung, C., Sherzad, M., & Arar, M. (2021). The implementation of the concept of Atmosphere in Kasuyo Sejima ́s Architecture. International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering Innovation, 3(4), 50-62. https://myjms.mohe.gov.my/index.php/ijarei/article/view/16343

Koolhaas, R. & Whiting, S. (1999). Spot Check: A Conversation between Rem Koolhaas and Sarah Whiting. Assemblage, (40), 36–55. https://doi.org/10.2307/3171371

Lucan, J. (1990). Oma- Rem Koolhaas: pour une culture de la congestión. Electra Moniteur.

Nuevo Museo de Arte Contemporáneo, Nueva York. (2012). [Fotografía]. Arquitectura Viva. https://arquitecturaviva.com/obras/nuevo-museo-de-arte-contemporaneo

Raposo, J., Salgado de la Rosa, M. y Butragueño, B. (2022). Conversando con Juan Herreros parte 1. “Dibujar con la palabra I: el diálogo/dibujo como eje transversal de una práctica colaborativa”. EGA Expresión Gráfica Arquitectónica, 27(45), 10-37. https://doi.org/10.4995/ega.2022.18045

Ribot Manzano, A. (2022). La ‘capacidad de acción’ de los espacios arquitectónicos. Estrategias proyectuales de sistemas abiertos. Cuadernos de Proyectos Arquitectónicos, (12), 66-75. https://doi.org/10.20868/cpa.2022.12.4957

Sennett, R. (2009). El artesano (Trad. M. Aurelio Galmarini). Anagrama.

Tzortzi, K. (2010). The art museum as a city or a machine for showing art? Architectural Research Quarterly, 14(2), 129–138. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1359135510000746